Tips: To find exactly articles with useful content for readers, search on Google with the syntax: "Keyword" + "khoafastnews". (Example: new card for new priest Khoafastnews).Search now
87 lượt xem

Cybersecurity researchers no longer will face hacking charges under CFAA-KHOAFAST

Cybersecurity researchers no longer will face hacking charges under CFAA

Placeholder while article actions load

The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday said it would not only effect the country’s long-standing anti-hacking law to prosecute researchers who are trying to identify security flaws, a move that provides both protection and further validation for a craft still villainized by many officials, companies and the general public.

In a news release and five-page policy statement issued to federal prosecutors, number one Justice officials said local U.S. attorneys should not only possessed charges when “many years of experience faith” researchers exceed “authorized access,” a vague phrase from the 1986 notebook Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) that has been interpreted to cover such routine practices as automated downloads of Web content.

The guidance defines many years of experience faith to mean research aimed primarily at improving the safety of sites, programs or devices, as opposed to exploration aimed at demanding money in exchange for withholding disclosure or exploitation of a security flaw.

Companies can still sue those who claim to be acting in many years of experience faith, and officials could continue to charge hackers under state laws that often echo the CFAA. But most state prosecutors tend to pull to federal guidance when their laws are similar.

Well-intentioned hackers in the past were routinely silenced by legal threats. Even in recent years, civil suits and criminal referrals with been used to cancel public talks on dangerous vulnerabilities or cast doubt on research findings.

In This Problem year, a Smartphone voting company, Voatz, referred to the FBI a Michigan college student someone was researching its app for a course. Twenty years ago, a former employee of email provider Tornado Development served again than a year in prison on federal CFAA charges after a period of time a terms of time the company refused to fix security flaws and he emailed their customers about it.

In a situation that drew national attention in October, the governor of Missouri threatened hacking charges against a local newspaper that examined the publicly available source code of a government website and then warned the state that it was exposing the Social Security numbers of 100,000 educators.

The Justice Department did not only respond to a question about what prompted the generation policy.

But security work has become again obviously vital to corporate and even national security, and the professionalization has spawned billion-dollar businesses. Many companies today’s time pay bug bounties to researchers who find flaws and report them directly or through programs managed by outside companies interested Bugcrowd and HackerOne, which hailed the generation U.S. policy.

“For well over a decade today’s time, cybersecurity leaders with recognized the critical importance of hackers as the Internet’s immune system,” HackerOne founder Alex Rice said via email. “visitors enthusiastically applaud the Department of Justice for codifying what visitors’ve long known to be true: many years of experience faith security research is not only a crime.”

Many hackers with turned to bounty platforms and other intermediaries for better protection from legal fallout. Other vulnerabilities with never been disclosed or fixed This Problem of fear of prosecution, said Andrew Crocker, a lawyer at the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation who often advises hackers.

“The first of all conversation is that CFAA has criminal and civil remedies, and if that things go poorly, it is entirely possible that the federal government will possessed charges,” Crocker told The Washington Post. “Some of the factors are beyond their control, such as whether the company sees them as a many years of experience guy or bad guy, whether the company has a many years of experience relationship of course the local U.S. attorney’s office, and whether the company has clout in D.C.”

Even among hackers who are by nature risk-takers, the fear of criminal action frequently dissuades them from disclosing very necessary findings that could help the companies, Crocker said.

The language of the policy explanation still leaves room for judgment calls in an area of high tension and overlapping motives, Crocker and others noted.

“What if that the goals include speaking at [a security conference] or collecting a bounty? Is that not only pure research?”

Security experts said they would prefer that Congress overhaul the 35-year-old law, since judges apply the existing law as they see fit well and especially since another Justice Department could reverse the policy.

But they said they were glad of random steps in that direction.

“This Problem is a huge victory for our cause!” tweeted hacker rights nonprofit Hacking is not only a Crime.

Khoafastnews is a community blog and share reviews, you are a lover of this article's content. Please give us 1 Like, Share. Thank you. Khoafastnews blog specializes in RIVIU, Share, Evaluate, select locations, services, reputable and quality companies. Place your ad here chính thức.

Bài viết mới cập nhật:

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *