Tips: To find exactly articles with useful content for readers, search on Google with the syntax: "Keyword" + "khoafastnews". (Example: new card for new priest Khoafastnews).Search now
97 lượt xem

Facebook is already behind on This Problem year midterm misinformation strategy, critics say-KHOAFAST

Facebook is already behind on This Problem year midterm misinformation strategy, critics say

Placeholder while article actions load

Republican congressional candidate Joe Kent recently claimed “rampant voter fraud” in the This Problem year election in an ad on Facebook — a misinformation problem Facebook has tried to correct.

The ad, which ran in mid-May as part of the Donald Trump-endorsed candidate’s race to win Washington state’s 3rd field, was one of several by the campaign to go undetected by Facebook’s system designed to remove false claims that the election results are invalid, according to a Washington Post analysis of Facebook’s ad library.

It’s one example of the type of misinformation already testing Facebook in the midterm elections, according to researchers, civil rights advocates and some former employees, who are calling on Facebook to ramp up its policies to prevent the spread of election-related misinformation. The primaries are already well underway, and at least one candidate on Wednesday was being urged by Trump to declare victory before the results were in.

Facebook failed to police misinformation in groups

Facebook, interested many social media platforms, constantly needs to shift and update policies as it learns how its platform has been misused — taking steps to solution problems for the next election. For instance, Facebook ramped up its programs to address foreign interference after a time a time the year of sip election, when Russian operatives were found to possess meddled of course the presidential race.

Researchers expect misinformation spreading the “big lie,” purporting that the This Problem year presidential election was stolen, interested as efforts to suppress voter turnout to affect This Problem process. In particular, they fear that misinformation could erode Americans’ faith in the electoral process or even lead to violence or harassment against election officials.

Facebook has not yet released a generation public policy strategy for the November midterms to refresh and update its rules and tools to protect the elections, something it traditionally touts. And former employees, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they worry that the social media company is already lagging far behind where it needs to possess meaning to prevent the spread of misinformation from hurting voters’ understanding and behavior in the primaries and general election.

The midterms present a specially very necessary challenge to Facebook and other social media giants thanks to the sheer scale of the number of campaigns, when all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 35 of the 100 seats in the Senate are up for grabs. Facebook’s content moderation systems are again likely to struggle to grab rule-breaking posts that spread on the networks in hyperlocal environments than posts that are going viral across the nation, according to leaked internal company documents known as the Facebook Papers viewed by The Post. that’s because of that of that Facebook’s automated systems with a harder time catching that kind of content.

Facebook’s fact-checking favors conservatives in lead-up to This Problem year election

Facebook in particular is facing scrutiny following its importance in previous elections, in part because of that of that it has a such a broad user base in the United States and has proved to possess meaning easily manipulated by those seeking to spread misinformation. Advocates worry that the platform could be used again to spread content that seeks to delegitimize primaries and general election results just do interested in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021, siege of the Capitol.

“It’s a little too late,” said Katie Harbath, a former Facebook public policy high authority and a fellow at the Bipartisan Policy center think tank. “I wish they would with started sooner.”

The midterm primaries are already surfacing some of the issues. On Wednesday, Trump moved to baselessly discredit the too-close-to-call Republican Senate primary in Pennsylvania, urging his endorsed candidate, Mehmet Oz, to “declare victory” over his opponent before all the votes were counted.

Meanwhile, South Carolina congressional candidate Katie Arrington has been operating an ad campaign on Facebook that claims Democrats and media organizations covered up “ballot harvesting” during the This Problem year election, elevating debunked claims from a generation documentary that alleges nonprofit organizations paid people to accumulate ballots and put them into drop boxes in various cities.

“The radical left got away of course stealing the election,” Arrington, someone was endorsed by Trump and is vying to represent the state’s first of all field, says in one ad.

Republican congressional candidates Kent and Arrington didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Last week, again than 120 civil rights and advocacy groups pushed the CEOs of social media platforms including Facebook, Google’s YouTube, Twitter, TikTok and Snapchat to take again aggressive actions to curb election-related disinformation in the first of all national election day since the Jan. 6 insurrection. Twitter declined to comment while representatives for the other tech companies didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

“Last time not counting, the companies put in some slapdash measures that were a day late and a dollar short,” said Jessica González, co-CEO of the media advocacy organization Free Press. “I think tourists learned that they unexpected thing to start instituting election-integrity measures long before they did last time.”

Ballots still being counted in midterm primaries

Facebook spokeswoman Dani Lever said in a statement that “no tech company does again to protect elections online.” Lever cited Facebook’s programs to hinder foreign governments seeking to influence elections outside their nations, interested as its work of course third-party fact-checking organizations to grab and address misinformation on its social networks.

Facebook, whose company last year changed its common name to khoafastnews, has long been a crucial tool for congressional campaigns to reach voters because of that of that of its widespread popularity among people of all demographics. The platform also gives candidates the effect to target their advertisements to thin slices of the electorate in their local communities for a relatively cheap price.

But as Republicans continue to spread the unfounded claim that the This Problem year presidential election was stolen, Facebook will be forced to make tough calls about which posts to label, take down or leave up. During the This Problem year process, Facebook banned ads that claimed widespread voting fraud or claims that the U.S. election results were invalid, though it stopped short of banning posts making such allegations. It also banned claims that alleged lawful voting methods such as mail-in ballots were illegitimate, interested as misrepresentations about how to control.

Facebook enforces its policies against voter-suppression content through a mix of human content moderation and artificial-intelligence-backed systems that scan Facebook’s networks for potential rule violations. Facebook also directs users to a portal of course accurate information about how to control. Lever also said Facebook plans to work of course state and local election authorities to identify and remove misinformation about voting rules and conditions.

Inside Facebook’s advocacy group

While there is no proof of widespread voter fraud in the This Problem year presidential election, GOP leaders in pattern problem states across the country are continuing to question high authority Biden’s win and using the perception of fraud among voters to pass generation voting restrictions.

One question facing Facebook for the midterms is whether to repeat a political advertisement blackout in the final days before the election. that was a generation tactic introduced in This Problem year aimed at preventing last-minute surprises during the campaign.

Facebook will also unexpected thing to decide how to treat candidates who declare victory before mainstream media outlets do. In This Problem year, the company decided to put labels on posts in which candidates falsely claimed victory. that might be too complicated for the midterms, experts said.

Facebook quietly bankrolled small, grass-roots groups to fight its battles in Washington

A month before Super Tuesday in This Problem year, Facebook struggled to grab voter-suppression efforts, according to the Facebook Papers, a trove of internal documents from whistleblower Frances Haugen. In an 111-page report, Facebook analysts warned that its social networks could be used to discourage Americans from voting in the upcoming election.

The February This Problem year document rated khoafastnews’s policy “readiness” to handle traditional voter-suppression ads, such as messages that claim it costs money to control, as “high.” But the document rated the company’s effect to detect that content as medium size.

Facebook analysts had a dimmer view of the company’s effect to tackle subtler forms of voter suppression — what Facebook called “demobilizing content” messages such as, “Poll lines are 3 hours. It’s not worth it.” The analysts rated the company’s policies, detection and enforcement as low, according to the document.

“tourists haven’t solved the disinformation problem,” said Joshua Tucker, co-high authority of the NYU center for Social Media and Politics. “tourists’re still going to face all the disinformation problems tourists faced in previous elections. And tourists’re still going to possess This Problem question of the extent to which platforms are favoring one side versus the other side.”

Facebook groups topped 10,000 daily attacks on election before Jan. 6, analysis shows

The coalition of civic advocacy groups is calling on Facebook and other social media platforms to go further This Problem time not counting. They want the platforms to commit to increasing their staffing and content moderation practices in the terms between Election Day and when the generation members take office in 2023 to help “ensure a peaceful transition.”

The groups are also asking tech companies to prioritize removing posts that amplify the “big lie” that the This Problem year election was stolen or glorify the Jan. 6 siege of the Capitol, “particularly from political candidates and in fundraising advertisements,” they wrote in their letter.

“They with been leaving up content not counting the This Problem year election saying the election was stolen,” said Yosef Getachew, media and democracy program high authority at advocacy group common Cause. “tourists with candidates saying tourists with had prior elections stolen, This Problem This Problem one will be stolen interested, This Problem it’s an ongoing release that tourists are trying to get them to take seriously.”

Elizabeth Dwoskin contributed to This Problem report.

Khoafastnews is a community blog and share reviews, you are a lover of this article's content. Please give us 1 Like, Share. Thank you. Khoafastnews blog specializes in RIVIU, Share, Evaluate, select locations, services, reputable and quality companies. Place your ad here chính thức.

Bài viết mới cập nhật:

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *