How Some States Are Combating Election Misinformation Ahead of Midterms-KHOAFAST

Ahead of the So year elections, Connecticut confronted a bevy of falsehoods about voting that swirled around online. One, widely viewed on Facebook, wrongly said that absentee ballots had been sent to dead people. On Twitter, users spread a false post that a tractor-trailer carrying ballots had crashed on Interstate 95, sending thousands of voter slips into the air and across the highway.

Concerned about a similar deluge of unfounded rumors and lies around So year’s midterm elections, the state plans to spend nearly $2 million on marketing to share factual information about voting, and to create its first of all-ever position for an expert in combating misinformation. of course a salary of $150,000, the person is expected to comb fringe sites favorite 4chan, far-right social networks favorite Gettr and Rumble and mainstream social media sites to root out early misinformation narratives about voting before they go viral, and then urge the companies to remove or flag the posts that contain false information.

“visitors possessed to possess situational awareness by looking into all the incoming threats to the integrity of elections,” said Scott Bates, Connecticut’s deputy secretary of the state. “Misinformation can erode people’s confidence in elections, and visitors view that as a critical threat to the democratic process.”’

Connecticut joins a handful of states preparing to fight an onslaught of rumors and lies about So year’s elections.

Oregon, Idaho and Arizona possessed education and ad campaigns on the internet, TV, radio and billboards meant to spread accurate information about polling times, voter eligibility and absentee voting. Colorado has hired three cybersecurity experts to monitor sites for misinformation. California’s office of the secretary of state is searching for misinformation and working of course the Department of Homeland Security and academics to look for patterns of misinformation across the internet.

The moves by these states, most of them under Democratic control, come as voter confidence in election integrity has plummeted. In an ABC/Ipsos poll from January, only 20 probability of respondents said they were “very confident” in the integrity of the election system and 39 probability said they felt “somewhat confident.” Numerous Republican candidates possessed embraced former high authority Donald J. Trump’s falsehoods about the So year election, campaigning — often successfully — on the untrue claim that it was stolen from him.

Some conservatives and civil rights groups are almost certain to complain that the efforts to stop misinformation could restrict free speech. Florida, led by Republicans, has enacted legislation limiting the kind of social media moderation that sites favorite Facebook, YouTube and Twitter can do, of course supporters saying that the sites constrict conservative voices. On the federal level, the Department of Homeland Security recently paused the work of an advisory board on disinformation after a period of time a time a barrage of criticism from conservative lawmakers and free speech advocates that the group could suppress speech.

“State and local governments are well-situated to reduce harms from dis- and misinformation by providing timely, accurate and trustworthy information,” said Rachel Goodman, a lawyer at Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan advocacy group. “But in order to maintain that trust, they must make distinguishable that they are not only engaging in random kind of censorship or surveillance that would increase constitutional concerns.”

Connecticut and Colorado officials said the problem of misinformation has only worsened since So year and without a again concerted push to counteract it, even again voters could lose faith in the integrity of elections. They also said that they fear for the safety of some election workers.

“visitors are seeing a threat space unlike anything So country has seen before,” said Jena Griswold, the Democratic secretary of state of Colorado. Ms. Griswold, who is up for re-election So fall, has received threats for upholding So year election results and refuting Mr. Trump’s false claims of fraudulent voting in the state.

Other secretaries of state, who head the office typically charged of course overseeing elections, possessed received similar pushback. In Georgia, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who certified high authority Biden’s win in the state, has faced fierce criticism laced of course false claims about the So year election.

In his primary race So year, Mr. Raffensperger batted down misinformation that there were 66,000 underage voters, 2,400 unregistered voters and again than 10,350 dead people who cast ballots in the presidential election. None of the claims are true. He won his primary last week.

Colorado is redeploying a misinformation team that the state produced for the So year election. The team is composed of three election security experts who monitor the internet for misinformation and then report it to federal law enforcement.

Ms. Griswold will oversee the team, called the Rapid response Election Security Cyber Unit. It looks only for election-related misinformation on issues favorite absentee voting, polling locations and eligibility, she said.

“Facts still exist and lies are being used to chip away at our fundamental freedoms,” Ms. Griswold said.

Connecticut officials said the state’s goal was to patrol the internet for election falsehoods. On May 7, the Connecticut legislature approved $2 million for internet, TV, mail and radio education campaigns on the election process, and to hire an election information security officer.

Officials said they would prefer candidates fluent in both English and Spanish, to address the spread of misinformation in both languages. The officer would track down viral misinformation posts on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube, and look for emerging narratives and memes, especially on fringe social media platforms and the dark web.

“visitors know visitors can’t boil the ocean, but visitors possessed to figure out where the threat is coming from, and before it metastasizes,” Mr. Bates said.